USPTO serial 77623675
QAQTIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QAQTIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas Peter Toth
Nicholas Peter Toth NEXUS LAW GROUP LLPSuite 1140 - 625 Howe StreetP.O. Box 9VANCOUVER, BC, V6C2T6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Ankle boots; Anoraks; Aprons; Ascots; Athletic uniforms; Baby bibs not of paper; Bandanas; Bathing trunks; Bathrobes; Beach shoes; Beachwear; Beanies; Belts; Berets; Blazers; Blouses; Blousons; Body shapers; Body stockings; Body suits; Boots; Bow ties; Boxer shorts; Bras; Brassieres; Briefs; Bustiers; Button-front aloha shirts; Camisoles; Capes; Caps; Cardigans; Chemises; Chemisettes; Clogs; Coats; Corsets; Coveralls; Crop tops; Dickies; Dress shirts; Dresses; Ear muffs; Fleece vests; Footwear; Fur stoles; Galoshes; Garter belts; Garters; Girdles; Gloves; Gowns; Halter tops; Hats; Headbands; Hooded sweat shirts; Hosiery; Infant wear; Insoles; Jackets; Jeans; Jerseys; Jogging suits; Jumpers; Knee highs; Lace boots; Leg warmers; Leggings; Leotards; Lingerie; Loungewear; Masquerade costumes; Mittens; Mountaineering boots; Neckerchiefs; Neckties; Neckwear; Negligees; Night gowns; Night shirts; Outdoor gloves; Over coats; Overalls; Pajamas; Panties; Pants; Pantyhose; Parkas; Polo shirts; Ponchos; Pullovers; Rain jackets; Rainwear; Reversible jackets; Robes; Rugby shirts; Sandals; Saris; Sarongs; Scarves; Shirts; Shoes; Shorts; Singlets; Ski bibs; Ski gloves; Ski wear; Skirts; Slacks; Sleepwear; Slippers; Slips; Sneakers; Snow suits; Soccer shoes; Socks; Sports bras; Stuff jackets; Suits; Surf wear; Suspenders; Sweat bands; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat shorts; Sweat suits; Sweatbands; Sweaters; Swim caps; Swim trunks; T-shirts; Tank tops; Teddies; Tennis shoes; Tennis wear; Ties; Tights; Tops; Track and field shoes; Track suits; Training shoes; Trench coats; Trousers; Turbans; Turtleneck sweaters; Undergarments; Underpants; Undershirts; Underwear; Unitards; Vests; Visors; Wind-jackets; Work shoes and boots; Wraps; Wrist bands; Zori | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |