USPTO serial 77623724
PIRATES: DANGERS OF THE DEEP SEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIRATES: DANGERS OF THE DEEP SEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Dalke
JULIE DALKE LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP650 TOWN CENTER DR FL 20COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1989UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed goods, namely, paper labels; stickers; signboards of paper or cardboard; placards of paper or cardboard; advertisement boards of paper or cardboard; towels of paper; paperboard; postcard paper; packing paper; tags for index cards; note books; printed paper control tokens, namely, game tokens; memo pads of paper; index cards; paper file jackets; pocket notebooks; sketchbooks; scrapbooks; photo albums; parcel tags, namely, price tags; ball point pens; writing brushes; felt pens for writing; pencils; pens; paint boxes; crayons; pastels; folders for papers; pencil sharpeners; plastic sheets for writing, printing, and marking, namely, sheets of plastics placed under a sheet of paper; boxes for pens; pen cases; stationery cases; wristbands for the retention of writing instruments; pen and pencil cases and boxes; rubber erasers; corrugated cardboard boxes; boxes made of paper; picture postcards; calendars; diagrams for playing video games; comic books; musical greeting cards; books in the field of video games; plans for video games; booklets in the field of video games; writing and drawing pads; greeting cards; postcards; printed timetables; diaries; magazines featuring video games; telephone directories; catalogs in the field of video games; printed tickets; pamphlets in the field of video games; posters; study guides; printed publications, namely, handbooks in the fields of video games; newsletters in the field of video games; photographs; three dimensional models for educational purposes, namely, architecture and structures models; anatomical models for educational purposes, namely, animal and plant models; modelling clay; paste for handicraft, namely, modelling paste; anatomical models for scientific, instructional, and educational purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | toy masks; rubber character toys; clockwork toys of metal; toy boxes, namely, practical jokes boxes; marionettes; fantasy character toys made of rattan; baby rattles; remote controlled toys, namely, boats, ships and cars; mascot dolls; toy mobiles; fantasy character toys made of wood; toy sets, namely, toy construction sets; puppets; scale model vehicles for children; musical toys; playing balls made of plastic for games; playing balls made of sponge for games; toy building blocks; flying discs; paper toys, namely, paper ships; plush toys; modeled plastic toy figurines; toy ships made of plastic; ring games; marbles for games; darts; billiard balls; billiard tables; billiard table cushions; billiard markers; billiard cues; chalk for billiard cues; pool cue tips; quoits; dominoes; roulette wheels; remote controlled amusement apparatus, namely, cars, planes and boats; mahjong; kaleidoscopes; board games; bingo cards; Japanese vertical pinball machine, namely, pachinko machines; backgammon games; kites; kite reels; dice; cups for dice; chess games; chessboards; checkers; checkerboards; playing cards; spinning tops; jigsaw puzzles; horseshoe games; play balloons; piñatas; trading card games; toy swords made of wood; toy swords made of bamboo; rackets; racket ball gloves; roller skates; rocking horses; knee guards for athletic use; playground equipment, namely, slides; body boards; batting gloves; boxing gloves; punching bags; paintball guns; skateboards; sling shots; bob-sleighs; baseballs; baseball gloves; baseball bat cases; baseball batting gloves; baseball catchers' masks; baseball mitts; baseball bats; baseball bases; chest protectors; prefabricated play swimming pools; table tennis balls; table tennis nets; tables for table tennis; table tennis rackets; protective covers for table tennis rackets; trampolines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nexon Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Nexon Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PIRATES: DANGERS OF THE DEEP SEA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |