Drawing for GOOD INNOVATION

USPTO serial 77624099

GOOD INNOVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD INNOVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S. HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketing; organization of exhibitions or trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; public relations; business management; business administrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 12, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 12, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 10, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 29, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance