USPTO serial 77624157
"BABIES ARE HEAVEN SCENT"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with "BABIES ARE HEAVEN SCENT"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moorestown, NJ
Mount Laurel, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Stafford
MICHAEL STAFFORD NORD & DEMAIO190 HIGHWAY 18 STE 201EAST BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aromatherapy lotions; Baby lotion; Bath lotion; Bathing lotions; Beauty lotions; Body lotion; Body lotions; Face and body lotions; Face milk and lotions; Facial lotion; Hair care lotions; Hair lotion; Hair lotions; Hand lotions; Lotions for face and body care; Non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions; Non-medicated foot lotions; Scented body lotions and creams; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin lotion; Skin lotions; Toning lotion, for the face, body and hands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |