USPTO serial 77624832
WORK PERFECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORK PERFECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W Hoover
GEORGE W HOOVER BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD.SUITE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrance and cosmetic products, namely, face cream; body cream; non-medicated anti-wrinkle cream; non-medicated skin renewal cream; eye cream; body lotion; body oil; non-medicated lip balm; skin balancing lotion; oil control skin lotion; non-medicated skin firming preparation; non-medicated skin blemish preparation; facial toner; body toner; facial cleanser; body cleanser; facial exfoliating preparation; body exfoliating preparation; body and hair shampoo and conditioner-in-one; eye makeup remover; facial makeup remover; face masque; body masque; skin refreshing lotion, cream and gel; hair shampoo; hair conditioner; hair spray; hair mousse; hair gel; hair humectant, namely, hair lotion; non-medicated revitalizing skin cream; body sunscreen; facial sunscreen; non-medicated lip suncare preparation; self-tanning creams; after sun soothing moisturizing lotions, creams and gels; foundation makeup; lipstick; lipgloss; eyeliner; eyeshadow; mascara; skin-tone corrector cream; face powder; body powder; skin bronzer; skin concealer; eyebrow pencils; cosmetic pencils; blusher; nail enamel; nail enamel top coat; nail enamel base coat; quick dry top coat for nails; nail conditioners; nail strengtheners; nail polish remover; ridgefiller for nails; cuticle moisturizing cream; cuticle removing preparations; nail whitening pencils and preparations; eau de perfume; eau de toilette; perfume; cologne; fragranced body lotion; fragranced body cream; bath powder; bath oil; skin cleansing lotion; skin cleansing gel; facial and body oil spray; soap; shaving foam; pre-shave preparations; after shave lotions and gels; after shave balm; anti-perspirant and deodorant for personal use; potpourri; massage oil; essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |