USPTO serial 77625454
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Reynolds Seidman
Jill Reynolds Seidman Cordish & Cordish601 E. Pratt St., 5th FloorBaltimore, MD 21202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, shirts, sweat shirts, pants, sweat pants, shorts, skirts, jackets, caps, visors, hats, headbands, socks, shoes, belts | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail outlets featuring clothing, gifts, sporting goods and equipment, food, drugs, cosmetics, perfumes, furniture, computers, and computer goods, musical recordings, housewares, linens, shoes and electronics; business management in the field of shopping centers, retail shopping outlets, marketplaces, residential facilities, hospitality facilities, commercial facilities, office facilities, entertainment facilities, restaurants and bars; art galleries; advertising and marketing services; on-line marketing services featuring residential, hospitality, office and commercial real estate and developments; business marketing of the casinos of others | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 036 | Shopping center services, namely, rental of shopping center space; real estate management in the field of shopping centers, shopping outlets, marketplaces, residential facilities, hospitality facilities, commercial facilities, office facilities, entertainment facilities, restaurants and bars; leasing of buildings or portions thereof; real estate leasing, namely, residential leasing; leasing of office space; leasing of commercial property; hospitality leasing in the nature of entertainment; real estate brokerage of condominiums, real estate listing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, night clubs, live performance by musical bands and singers; providing mixed-use entertainment facilities, namely, providing entertainment facilities for karaoke clubs; comedy clubs; entertainment services, namely, puppet theater services; movie theaters playing animated movies; motion picture theaters; live performance theaters; dinner theaters; amusement arcades; providing virtual reality entertainment facilities; providing facilities for family recreation activities; museums, health club facilities, namely, providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exercise; casinos | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurants; cocktail lounges; bar services; sports bar services; hotel services; vacation spas, namely, providing temporary accommodations and meals to clients of a health or beauty spa; resort hotels; providing food and drink; coffee shops; bistros; catering; provision of function, conference and convention facilities; provision of social function facilities for special occasions | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Health spas, namely, cosmetic body care services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |