USPTO serial 77625910
GRASSHOPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRASSHOPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W. LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Electric bicycles and structural parts therefor; electric bicycle and bicycle accessories, namely, Baskets adapted for bicycles, Bicycle bells; Bicycle chains, Bicycle frames, Bicycle frames and bicycle handlebar grips, Bicycle grip tape, Bicycle horns, Bicycle kickstands, Bicycle pumps; Bicycle racks for vehicles, Bicycle saddle covers, Bicycle saddles, Bicycle seat posts, Bicycle stands, Bicycle tags, Bicycle trailers, Bicycle training harnesses, Bicycle training wheels, Bicycle water bottle cages, Fitted bicycle covers, Frames for bicycles, Frames for bicycles, Front and rear bicycle rack packs, Gear levers for bicycle wheels, Motors for bicycles, Mudguards for bicycles, Pannier bags for bicycles, Saddle covers for bicycles, Saddlebags for bicycles, Saddles for bicycles, Safety pads for bicycles, Spoke clips for bicycle wheels, Spokes for bicycle wheels, Suspension systems for bicycles, Tire inflators, Tires for bicycles, Water bottle holders for bicycles, Wheel hubs for bicycles, Bicycle pumps, Bicycle racks for vehicles, Bicycle saddle covers, Bicycle saddles, Bicycle seat posts, Bicycle stands, Bicycle tags, Bicycle trailers, Bicycle training harnesses, Bicycle training wheels, Bicycle water bottle cages, Fitted bicycle covers, Frames for bicycles, Frames, for luggage carriers, for bicycles, Front and rear bicycle rack packs, Gear levers for bicycle wheels, Motors for bicycles, Mudguards for bicycles, Pannier bags for bicycles, Saddle covers for bicycles, Saddlebags for bicycles, Saddles for bicycles, Safety pads for bicycles, Spoke clips for bicycle wheels, Spokes for bicycle wheels, Suspension systems for bicycles, Tire inflators, Tires for bicycles, Water bottle holders for bicycles, Wheel hubs for bicycles Velomobile bodies, namely, specially adapted for weather protection shells for use on bicycles and adult tricycles; electric bicycle and Bicycle parts, namely, brakes, chains, handle bars, handlebar grips, tubes and connectors for bicycle frames, gear wheels, drive chains, disk wheels, handle bar ends, brake shoes, change-speed gears, drive trains, fork crown covers, forks, front fork joints, handle bar stems, sprockets, gears Bicycle pedals, wheels, and rims for bicycle wheels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |