Drawing for RUIZ FLOUR TORTILLAS

USPTO serial 77625912

RUIZ FLOUR TORTILLAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUIZ FLOUR TORTILLAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Yahiro

ROBERT A. YAHIRO RODI POLLOCK PETTKER CHRISTIAN & PRAMOV444 S FLOWER ST STE 1700LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2918UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Tortillas; flour tortillasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 31, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 30, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance