Drawing for ICREATE

USPTO serial 77626134

ICREATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICREATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jenifer deWolf Paine

Jenifer deWolf Paine Proskauer Rose LLPEleven Times SquareTrademark File RoomNew York, NY 10036-8299

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable educational materials for teachers, namely, worksheets, activity sheets, and educational tutorialsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 15, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Sep 29, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 13, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 13, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 22, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 22, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance