USPTO serial 77626289
LA HERRADURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4092684Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 31, 2012
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LA HERRADURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRODUCTOS DEL CONVENTO, S.A. DE C.V.
Mexico City, D.F., MX
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS DEL CONVENTO, S.A. DE C.V.
PRODUCTOS DEL CONVENTO, S.A. DE C.V.
Mexico City, D.F., MX
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS DEL CONVENTO, S.A. DE C.V.
PRODUCTOS DEL CONVENTO, S.A. DE C.V.
Mexico City, D.F., MX
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS DEL CONVENTO, S.A. DE C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Litman
RICHARD C LITMANP.O. BOX 15035 CRYSTAL CITY STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22215-0035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS DEL CONVENTO, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS DEL CONVENTO, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS DEL CONVENTO, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named LA HERRADURA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |