Drawing for IRONMAN IMAX

USPTO serial 77626550

IRONMAN IMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IRONMAN IMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

JENNIFER SHEEHAN ANDERSON HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP38500 WOODWARD AVENUESUITE 100BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Tires for motor vehicles, excluding bicycle tires and motorcycle tiresABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 19, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 19, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 19, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 22, 2009CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 13, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 12, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 12, 2009OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 17, 2009EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Feb 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance