USPTO serial 77626584
U.S. WATER SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with U.S. WATER SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce H. Little
BRUCE H. LITTLE LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P.80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET, 4200 IDS CENTERMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals, namely boiler chemicals used for water treatment, for cooling water treatment, for reverse osmosis treatment, for return line treatment, for waste water treatment, for process water treatment, for service and auxiliary water treatment, for open and closed loop treatments, to be used in a variety of applications for the treatment of water to increase, reduce, prevent, remove, sanitize, pre-treat, or protect against sludge, slag, bacteria, scale, corrosion, waste, slime, algae, microorganisms, fungi, fouling, dissolved oxygen and minerals, deposits, oil, grease, hardness and chemical compounds | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1997 |
| 040 | treatment of water of water with chemicals, namely boiler water treatment, cooling water treatment, reverse osmosis treatment, return line treatment, waste water treatment, process water treatment, service and auxiliary water treatment, as well as open and closed loop treatments to purify water used in industrial, renewable fuel, renewable energy, commercial, power generation, data center, food processing, food and beverage manufacturing, microelectronic, refining, mining, steel and pharmaceutical industries | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |