Drawing for UNIQUUS

USPTO serial 77626711

UNIQUUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with UNIQUUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Ziety

JAMES ZIETY BORDA LORENZ PC39555 ORCHARD HILL PLACESUITE 370NOVI, MI 48375

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012automobiles and structural parts thereforABANDONED—
035import and export agency services in the field of automobiles and parts and fittings thereof; services of retail stores featuring automobiles and parts and fittings thereofABANDONED—
037automobile maintenance and repairABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 18, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 18, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 18, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 8, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 8, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 30, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 30, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 2, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 22, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 2, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 22, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance