USPTO serial 77627022
MANALITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MANALITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer V. Whiting
JENNIFER V. WHITING VENABLE LLP2049 CENTURY PARK E STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Induction, LED and specialized lighting systems, namely, lighting systems comprised of lamps and generators, light fixtures and light bulbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and retrofitting of induction, LED and specialized lighting systems, light fixtures and light bulbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Distribution services, namely, delivery of induction, LED and specialized lighting systems, light fixtures and light bulbs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |