USPTO serial 77627415
BLASTBLINDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLASTBLINDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JOSE, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
Easton, MD
Easton, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Billheimer
SUSAN E BILLHEIMER PATTON BOGGS LLP2550 M ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1350UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Window blinds; window blinds designed to capture glass particles in the event of an explosion and to protect the interior of buildings from solar rays and the associated heat | ACTIVE | Nov 21, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by V. GAZAWAY LIVING TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by GAZAWAY FAMILY TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by V. GAZAWAY LIVING TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by GAZAWAY FAMILY TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by Glasslock, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Glasslock, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named BLASTBLINDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | IIOA | INADVERTENTLY ISSUED OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |