USPTO serial 77627845
BC PELLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BC PELLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Prince George, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda L. Palomar
Linda L. Palomar Clark Hill PLC150 North Michigan Ave.Suite 2700Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Carbonaceous products from the heating of carbon-containing materials in a low or no oxygen atmosphere, namely, charcoal and char, formed from biomass through carbonization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |