USPTO serial 77628211
NAGA KING CHILLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NAGA KING CHILLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Hynak
MICHAEL J. HYNAK HYNAK & ASSOICATES, P.C.812 S COURTHOUSE RDARLINGTON, VA 22204-2105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fresh fruits and vegetables, namely, chillies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Department of Horticulture, Government of Nagaland
- Other trademarks owned by Department of Horticulture, Government of Nagaland
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named NAGA KING CHILLI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |