USPTO serial 77628666
THE SNEAKY CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3751229Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 2010
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SNEAKY CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvington, NY
Irvington, NY
Irvington, NY
IRVINGTON, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared and frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, seafood, poultry, cheese or vegetables; processed vegetable-based food bars, namely, snack bars made primarily of vegetables; processed fruit-based food bars, namely, snack bars made primarily of fruit; protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars; dairy-based beverages; fruit-based food beverages; vegetable-based food beverages; prepared and frozen breakfast entrees consisting primarily of meat, eggs, bacon, potato pancakes, fried potatoes, ham, vegetables or fruits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 23, 2008 |
| 030 | Prepared and frozen meals consisting primarily of rice or pasta; bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods and bakery desserts; sandwiches; granola-based snack bars; prepared and frozen breakfast entrees consisting primarily of breakfast sandwiches, breakfast burritos, pancakes, French toast, or waffles; ice cream; coffee-based beverages; tea-based beverages; cocoa-based beverages; snack bars made primarily of processed oats; snack bars made primarily of processed grains | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 23, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE SNEAKY CHEF, INC
- Other trademarks owned by THE SNEAKY CHEF, INC
- Other trademarks owned by THE SNEAKY CHEF, INC
- Other trademarks owned by THE SNEAKY CHEF FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named THE SNEAKY CHEF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |