USPTO serial 77629464
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CAMBRIDGE, MN
Cambridge, MN
Cambridge, MN
Cambridge, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth D. Suzan
Kenneth D. Suzan BARNES & THORNBURG LLP225 SOUTH SIXTH STREET, SUITE 2800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4662United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals, namely, boiler chemicals used for water treatment, for cooling water treatment, for reverse osmosis treatment, for return line treatment, for waste water treatment, for process water treatment, for service and auxiliary water treatment, for open and closed loop treatments, to be used in a variety of applications for the treatment of water to increase, reduce, prevent, remove, sanitize, pre-treat, or protect against sludge, slag, bacteria, scale, corrosion, waste, slime, algae, microorganisms, fungi, fouling, dissolved oxygen and minerals, deposits, oil, grease, hardness and chemical compounds | ACTIVE | Dec 19, 2006 |
| 040 | [ treatment of water with chemicals, namely, boiler water treatment, cooling water treatment, reverse osmosis treatment, return line treatment, waste water treatment, process water treatment, service and auxiliary water treatment, as well as open and closed loop treatments to purify water used in industrial, renewable fuel, renewable energy, commercial, power generation, data center, food processing, food and beverage manufacturing, microelectronic, refining, mining, steel and pharmaceutical industries ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 2006 |
| 042 | [ Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software online via the Internet for the treatment of water, with chemicals, namely, boiler water treatment, cooling water treatment, reverse osmosis treatment, return line treatment, waste water treatment, processed water treatment, service and auxiliary water treatment, as well as open and closed looped treatments to purify water used in industrial, renewable fuel, renewable energy, commercial, power generation, data center, food processing, food and beverage manufacturing, microelectronic, refining, mining, steel and pharmaceutical industries ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2025 | NCP7 | NOTICE OF PARTIAL CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 7, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 3, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |