USPTO serial 77630297
CERTIFIED SMART CARD INDUSTRY PROFESSIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 2, 2009
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CERTIFIED SMART CARD INDUSTRY PROFESSIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Princeton Junction, NJ
Princeton Junction, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jenevieve J. Maerker, Esq.
Jenevieve J. Maerker, Esq. Foley Hoag LLP155 Seaport BoulevardSeaport WestBoston, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Testing, analysis, and evaluation of the knowledge, skills and abilities of others for the purpose of certification and re-certification in the field of smart card technology | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |