USPTO serial 77630302
ONTRACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 2010
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ONTRACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
On-Trace Agri-Food Traceability (Ontario)
Guelph, CA
Other trademarks owned by On-Trace Agri-Food Traceability (Ontario)
On-Trace Agri-Food Traceability (Ontario)
Guelph, CA
Other trademarks owned by On-Trace Agri-Food Traceability (Ontario)
On-Trace Agri-Food Traceability (Ontario)
Guelph, CA
Other trademarks owned by On-Trace Agri-Food Traceability (Ontario)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorelei G. Graham
LORELEI G. GRAHAM Miller Thomson LLPOntario AgriCentre, 100 Stone Road WestSuite 301Guelph, N1G5L3Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by On-Trace Agri-Food Traceability (Ontario)
- Other trademarks owned by On-Trace Agri-Food Traceability (Ontario)
- Other trademarks owned by On-Trace Agri-Food Traceability (Ontario)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONTRACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |