Drawing for PRECIOUS PLAYMATES

USPTO serial 77630436

PRECIOUS PLAYMATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECIOUS PLAYMATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edwin Komen

EDWIN KOMEN SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1300 I STREET NW11TH FLOOR EASTWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Dolls and accessories therefor and playsets for dolls, but expressly excluding such goods in the field of adult themed entertainment featuring female models in full or partial nudityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 14, 2009CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 22, 2009EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 13, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance