Drawing for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW

USPTO serial 77630734

HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter K. Hahn

PETER K. HAHN LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS, LLP600 W BROADWAY STE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3372UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate consulting; real estate management; leasing of real estate; leasing of office space; leasing of commercial space; and real estate brokerage servicesACTIVE—
037Real estate developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 2, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 1, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 1, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 1, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 1, 2009GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 1, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance