USPTO serial 77631128
POWERTEAM LURES SERIOUS BAITS FOR SERIOUS FISHERMEN DEADLY ON BASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3894474Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2010
- Examiner
- IMAM, AMEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POWERTEAM LURES SERIOUS BAITS FOR SERIOUS FISHERMEN DEADLY ON BASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Artificial fishing lures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bernotsky, Bob
- Other trademarks owned by Bernotsky, Bob
- Other trademarks owned by Bernotsky, Bob
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named POWERTEAM LURES SERIOUS BAITS FOR SERIOUS FISHERMEN DEADLY ON BASS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |