USPTO serial 77631990
TIME OUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIME OUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Tolpin
THOMAS W. TOLPIN TOLPIN & PARTNERS, PC11 S LASALLE ST STE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60603-1316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software downloadable on the internet and wireless devices for training and instruction to coaches, participants, students, teachers, and care providers in the fields of academic improvement, learning and self-improvement; downloadable software for training and coaching relating to academic improvement and learning; interactive software programs for assessing reading ability, academic improvement and learning downloadable on the internet and wireless devices in the field of improving learning skills; downloadable books, downloadable games and downloadable electronic files in the fields of learning, personal discipline, self-help, and self-healing; multimedia files containing artwork, text, audio, visual, and games relating to behavior management, meditation, self-analysis, visualization techniques color usage and sound identification which are downloadable on the internet and wireless devices; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of downloadable books in the fields of academic improvement, learning and self-improvement; downloadable software for training and coaching in the field of self-improvement; computer application software for mobile phones, wireless devices and handheld electronic devices for coaching and training in the field of physical and mental health; downloadable electronic game programs relating to behavior management, meditation, self-analysis, visualization techniques for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education, color usage for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education, and sound identification for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education; electronic game software relating to behavior management, meditation, self-analysis, visualization techniques for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education, color usage for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education, and sound identification for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education; electronic game software for cellular telephones, wireless devices and handheld electronic devices relating to behavior management, meditation, self-analysis, visualization techniques for purposes of facilitating behavior management, and education, color usage for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education, and sound identification for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education; game software relating to behavior management, meditation, self-analysis, visualization techniques for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education, color usage for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education, and sound identification for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education; computer game programs relating to behavior management, meditation, self-analysis, visualization techniques for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education, color usage for purposes of facilitating behavior management and education; and computer software programs for conducting personality and fitness assessments in the fields of academic improvement, learning and self-improvement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2013 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |