Drawing for GULFSTREAM SWIMMING POOL HEAT PUMPS

USPTO serial 77632210

GULFSTREAM SWIMMING POOL HEAT PUMPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GULFSTREAM SWIMMING POOL HEAT PUMPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony L. Miele

ASHLEY K LONG MIELE LAW GROUP PC277 MAIN STREETSUITE 209MARLBOROUGH, MA 01752

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Swimming Pool heat pumpsACTIVEMay 24, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 13, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 26, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 31, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 8, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 8, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 8, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance