USPTO serial 77632530
KEVIN STRONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4257912Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2012
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KEVIN STRONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Upper Marlboro, MD
Upper Marlboro, MD
Upper Marlboro, MD
Upper Marlboro, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Strong, Kevin D
605 Commerce DriveUpper Marlboro, MD 20774UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital media, namely, pre-recorded video cassettes, digital video discs, digital versatile discs, downloadable audio and video recordings, DVDs, and high definition digital disks featuring motivational fitness instruction and music | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Strong, Kevin D
- Other trademarks owned by Strong, Kevin D
- Other trademarks owned by Simms, Kevin D
- Other trademarks owned by Simms, Kevin D
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named KEVIN STRONG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |