USPTO serial 77632960
IT FRAMES GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IT FRAMES GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stuart E. Benson
STUART E. BENSON MANELLI DENISON & SELTER PLLC2000 M STREET, N.W., SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys; metal building materials, namely, metal frames for doors and windows, hand rails, stainless steel, iron, unwrought and semiunwrought brass, aluminum alloys, polished stainless steel, satinated stainless steel, chromed iron, lacquered iron, lacquered steel, nickel, wrought steel; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; ironmongery (metal goods), namely, (1) door hardware, namely, door keys and key cylinders, (2) metal components for metal protective and security window shutters, namely, slats, shutterboxes, side frames, end caps, crank handles, pull straps, side tracks, ball bearings and installation hardware, namely, rollers, rails, cables, carriers, pins, locks, clips, brackets and screws, (3) metal handles for doors and tools, and (4) metal hinges; small items of metal hardware, namely, high security locks and sheet metal plates primarily for the casino and gaming industry; pipes and tubes of metal; metal safes | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; goods not included in other classes of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics, namely, window fittings, door fittings, check-out counters, shelving, cabinets, chairs, tables, desks, beds, drawers, wardrobes, benches, bookshelves, cupboards, storage racks, sideboards, sofa, boxes, dining tables and chairs, furniture chests, dressers, night stands, display cases, shelves; non-metal safes; cash wrap counters; goods of common metal, namely, clothing hangers, metal mirror frames, metal shelves, metal chairs, metal inner structures for furniture, metal display racks | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpets; plastic, vinyl, wood, and rubber floor and wall coverings; non-textile wall hangings | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction services, namely, concrete paving, site clearing, excavation, pad preparation, grading, and asphalt paving services, home repair, furniture refinishing; building maintenance and repair services; installation services, namely, installation of custom made furniture, accessories and lighting systems and fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transport, namely, transport and delivery of goods; packaging of goods for transportation; storage of goods; travel arrangement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Snedyn Assets S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Snedyn Assets S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named IT FRAMES GROUP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |