Drawing for THINK LIKE A PLANET

USPTO serial 77633353

THINK LIKE A PLANET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINK LIKE A PLANET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathryn A. Berryman

Cathryn A. Berryman WINSTEAD PCPO BOX 131851DALLAS, TX 75313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials, namely, curricula in the field of education, creative thinking and parenting concerning education of children, entertainment of children, drug and alcohol awareness, intrafamily relationships, health of children, discipline, values, goals and social skillsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting workshops, seminars, courses and distributing course materials in connection therewith on a variety of topics designed for adults and children, namely, in the field of education and educational activity, creative thinking and parenting concerning education of children, entertainment of children, drug and alcohol awareness, intrafamily relationships, health of children, discipline, values, goals and social skillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 21, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 21, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 20, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 19, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 23, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 21, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 20, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 11, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 11, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 11, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2009CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2009CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2009CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance