Drawing for RECYCLING WORKS MICHIGAN

USPTO serial 77633359

RECYCLING WORKS MICHIGAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3732572Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 29, 2009
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECYCLING WORKS MICHIGAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christian Fuller

CHRISTIAN FULLER LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN FULLER PLC2000 TOWN CENTERSUITE 1900SOUTHFIELD, MN 48075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Recycling of waste and trashSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2011C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 22, 2011CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 16, 2011CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 28, 2011PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 27, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2009UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 29, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 21, 2009REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2009CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 7, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 22, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 22, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance