USPTO serial 77633631
OBOPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3733451Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2010
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OBOPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
OBOPAY MOBILE TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
BANGALORE, IN
Other trademarks owned by OBOPAY MOBILE TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for processing and authenticating electronic payments to and from others; magnetically encoded payment cards, debit cards, and stored value cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2006 |
| 035 | Providing customer service and product inquiry services via telephone and e-mail for others relating to clearing and reconciling financial transaction services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2006 |
| 036 | Electronic payment services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services via electronic or optical communications networks; enabling the transfer of funds via electronic and optical communications networks and telephones and mobile and electronic communication devices; administering of financial transactions for credit cards, debit cards, and stored value cards; prepaid purchase cards services for allowing users to transfer value via electronic or optical communications networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2006 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software in the field of clearing and reconciling financial transactions, electronic funds transfer and payment services, electronic payment services; application service provider services featuring software for use in the field of clearing and reconciling financial transactions, and electronic funds transfer and payment services; computer technology support services, namely, help-desk services relating to clearing and reconciling financial transaction services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Obopay, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Obopay, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Obopay, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OBOPAY MOBILE TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OBOPAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |