USPTO serial 77633692
LASHACTIVATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LASHACTIVATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care, bath and cosmetic products, namely, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, blush, lip liner, brow pencils, lipstick, lip gloss, lip balms, makeup brushes, makeup sponges, makeup puffs, cosmetic and lip color palettes, cosmetic compacts which include palettes of facial and/or lip colors sold as a unit with or without an applicator, undereye concealers, foundations, foundations with sunscreen, face powders, soaps, bath oil, skin moisturizer, fragrances and perfumes for personal use, deodorants for personal use, talcum powder, shampoo, conditioner, hair styling gels and spray, nail polish, skin creams and powders for use as a bronzer, sun tan lotion, sun screens, facial cleanser and facial toner, body lotion, exfoliants, face creams, and moisturizing oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |