Drawing for YO COCINO MEJOR QUE MI SUEGRA

USPTO serial 77634005

YO COCINO MEJOR QUE MI SUEGRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with YO COCINO MEJOR QUE MI SUEGRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of a television series featuring cooking competitionsACTIVEMay 30, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 15, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 15, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 21, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 21, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 10, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 8, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 1, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 4, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 3, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 13, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 12, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 30, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 9, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 20, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Dec 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance