USPTO serial 77634048
FLIP FLOPS GRILL & CHILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4081627Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2012
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLIP FLOPS GRILL & CHILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Smyrna Beach, FL
New Smyrna Beach, FL
New Smyrna Beach, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services; Carry-out restaurants; Restaurant, bar and catering services; Restaurants | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Flip Flops Grill & Chill, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Flip Flops Grill & Chill, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Flip Flops Grill & Chill, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named FLIP FLOPS GRILL & CHILL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2016 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |