Drawing for CULINARY INSTITUTE LENOTRE

USPTO serial 77634355

CULINARY INSTITUTE LENOTRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CULINARY INSTITUTE LENOTRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Cain

JOHN C. CAIN WONG, CABELLO, LUTSCH, RUTHERFORD ET AL20333 SH 249 STE 600HOUSTON, TX 77070UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing classes, workshops, and camps in the fields of the culinary artsACTIVEJan 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 27, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 24, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 11, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2009IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 19, 2009AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 18, 2009EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance