USPTO serial 77636305
YOGI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 733Notice of Allowance
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
The USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance. To complete registration you generally need to file a Statement of Use or an extension request before the deadline.
Need help with YOGI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Notice of Allowance, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $349*
Plus Government fees of $150
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
SPRINGFIELD, OR, US
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Los Angeles, CA, US
Los Angeles, CA, US
The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
Eugene, OR, US
SPRINGFIELD, OR, US
Eugene, OR, US
The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Los Angeles, CA, US
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Surjit P. Soni
Surjit P. Soni THE SONI LAW FIRMP.O. Box 91593PASADENA, CA 91109United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food, or ingredient for making other foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KAUR PURI, BIBIJI INDERJIT
- Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by EAST WEST TEA COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KAUR PURI, BIBIJI INDERJIT
- Other trademarks owned by KAUR PURI, BIBIJI INDERJIT
- Other trademarks owned by KAUR PURI, BIBIJI INDERJIT
- Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by STAFF ENDOWMENT LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KAUR PURI, BIBIJI INDERJIT
- Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by Golden Temple of Oregon, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EAST WEST TEA COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Golden Temple of Oregon, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The trustees of the YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by KAUR PURI, BIBIJI INDERJIT
- Other trademarks owned by KAUR PURI, BIBIJI INDERJIT
- Other trademarks owned by KAUR PURI, BIBIJI INDERJIT
- Other trademarks owned by YOGI BHAJAN ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by STAFF ENDOWMENT LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named YOGI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |