USPTO serial 77637822
SEATTLE METROPOLITANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3807898Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEATTLE METROPOLITANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Point Roberts, WA
Point Roberts, WA
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George F. Kondor, Q.C.
MICHAEL P HOGAN SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 5TH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, [ athletic shoes, boots, capes, dresses, football shoes, footwear, skirts, ] jackets, jerseys, [ lacrosse jerseys, football jerseys, hockey jerseys, ] hats, [ socks, ] shirts, [ tee shirts, golf shirts, ] sweat shirts, sweaters [, sleepwear, pants, pullover, short pants, neck warmers, scarves, suits, turtlenecks, uniforms, undergarments, baseball uniforms, vests, wrist bands, and sun visors ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 14, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2016 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |