USPTO serial 77639140
MLS.COM AMERICA'S REAL ESTATE PORTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MLS.COM AMERICA'S REAL ESTATE PORTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John N. Jennison
JOHN N. JENNISON JENNISON & SHULTZ, P.C.2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, SEARCH ENGINE SERVICES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE AVAILABLE OVER A NETWORK IN ORDER TO CREATE PERSONALIZED ON-LINE INFORMATION SERVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, ACTING AS AN APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER IN THE FIELD OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TO HOST COMPUTER APPLICATION SOFTWARE FOR EXTRACTION AND RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION FROM DATABASES AND COMPUTER NETWORKS; DATA MINING BY MEANS OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; AND COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING INDEXES OF INFORMATION, INDEXES OF WEBSITES AND INDEXES OF OTHER INFORMATION SOURCES IN CONNECTION WITH GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |