Drawing for SIMPLY TOUCH

USPTO serial 77639607

SIMPLY TOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLY TOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming services; providing computer programming services to customers that enable them to provide video and audio content, prepaid recharge, postpaid mobile bill payment, and ticketing; Development of technologies for the fabrication of circuits for wireless communication and electronic data processing; Support for dual-interface contact or contactless smart cards including telecommunications subscriber identity module cards for cellular phones and other mobile devices, namely, support in the nature of software maintenance services for said contact or contactless smart cards, support for subscriber identification modules in the nature of computer technology help desk services and software maintenance and support in the nature of software maintenance and trouble shooting services for contact or contactless smart cards and other telecommunications network elements used in conjunction with said contact or contactless smart cardsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Mar 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 15, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 15, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 21, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Apr 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 6, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 8, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 30, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance