USPTO serial 77641768
DIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emil Chang
EMIL CHANG VENTURE PACIFIC LAW, PC5201 GREAT AMERICA PKWY STE 270SANTA CLARA, CA 95054-1126UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductors, semiconductor processors, semiconductor processor chips, integrated circuits, integrated circuit chips, circuit boards, microcontrollers, microprocessors, memories and semiconductor wafers; semiconductors for processing images; semiconductors for correcting images; semiconductors for display devices; semiconductors for display driving devices; semiconductors for televisions; semiconductors for media players; semiconductors for digital picture frames; semiconductors for time keeping apparatus with digital displays; semiconductors for networking; multimedia processors; computer software, computer programs and firmware for use with all of the foregoing; multimedia software and applications, multimedia hardware and firmware for use in the processing and display of digital files, including video, text, binary, moving pictures, still images, graphics, and multimedia files; instructional material, namely, development manuals, product specifications and instruction sheets for use with all of the foregoing; computer software, namely, application integration and connectivity software, computer operating system software, image processing software, image correction software; computer operating programs; and computer software and hardware for the facilitation of third party software applications for image display and processing; computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |