USPTO serial 77641932
DEF JAM ELECTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEF JAM ELECTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
Brad D. Rose Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Cellular telephone services; telephone communication services; wireless telephone services; local and long distance telephone communication services; telephone communication services, namely, prepaid telephone services via the Internet; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; telecommunications gateway services; telecommunications services, namely, ISDN services; telecommunication services, namely, wireless PBX services, wireless digital messaging services, and wireless facsimile mail services; telecommunication services, namely, personal communication services; telecommunication services, namely, voice mail services; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; electronic mail services; electronic store-and-forward messaging services; cellular-based dispatch communication services; prepaid cellular telephone services; voice-activated cellular telephone services; emergency cellular telephone services; transmission of data via cellular communication networks; providing personal identification numbers in association with cellular telecommunications; facsimile transmissions; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; paging services; electronic and wireless transmission of messages, voices and data; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning television and television actors, film, motion picture, movie actors, theater and theatrical actors, comedy and comedians, music and musicians, performance and recording artists, musical recordings in all variety formats, music tours, sports and sports celebrities, arts and variety entertainment, travel, literature, clothing and related accessories, news and politics and politicians, goods and services all relating to the telecommunications and computer industries, and a wide range of other topics of general interest; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning television and television actors, film, motion pictures, movie actors, theater and theatrical actors, comedy and comedians, music and musicians, performance and recording artists, musical recordings in all variety formats, music tours, sports and sports celebrities, arts and variety entertainment, travel, literature, clothing and related accessories, news, politics and politicians, goods and services all relating to the telecommunications and computer industries, and a wide range of other topics of general interest | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |