Drawing for HOUSE DECIDED

USPTO serial 77643797

HOUSE DECIDED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOUSE DECIDED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Walker

Richard A. Walker McKoon, Williams & Haun12600 Deerfield ParkwaySuite 100Alpharetta, GA 30004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012License plate holders and license plate framesACTIVE—
020Non-metal novelty license platesACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, caps, hats, headbands, shirts, pants, sweaters, skirts, shorts, skorts, dresses, blouses, jackets, coats, rainwear, shoes, boots, socks, slippers, tights, pantyhose, gloves, mittens, undergarments, overalls, tank tops, knit caps, sweat shirts, sweat pants, jogging and warm-up outfits, vests, scarves, belts, and suspendersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 17, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 12, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 16, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 12, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 12, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 29, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 28, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 11, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2009GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2009GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2009NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance