USPTO serial 77643984
INTELLIGEN LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLIGEN LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONCTON, NB, CA
MONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
SPIELO INTERNATIONAL CANADA ULC
MONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | wagering systems, namely computer hardware and software for processing and reporting on video lottery or slot transactions and performing related management and accounting functions; computer software used to operate video lottery or slot systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GTECH CANADA ULC
- Other trademarks owned by IGT CANADA SOLUTIONS ULC
- Other trademarks owned by SPIELO INTERNATIONAL CANADA ULC
- Other trademarks owned by Spielo Manufacturing ULC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INTELLIGEN LITE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |