USPTO serial 77644283
·BEST· 'BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTION TECHNOLOGY'
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ·BEST· 'BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTION TECHNOLOGY'?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Copthorne, West Sussex, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Heating apparatus; heating systems; space heating systems and installations; high efficiency industrial and commercial heating installations for high volume buildings; Cooling systems, industrial ventilation apparatus; air inductor apparatus; waste air extract systems, ventilation installations and apparatus for systems with specialist controls to harmonize such systems synergistically with the purpose of improving the building environment, special lighting and systems, power generation and building optimising energy saving controls parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business appraisals; business consultancy; business information; business management and organisation consultancy; business research; management (advisory services for business); all directed to the improvement of efficiency of energy systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial consultancy; financial management; financial services; all directed to the improvement of efficiency of energy systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Joan Philomena Jones
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named ·BEST· 'BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTION TECHNOLOGY'
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |