USPTO serial 77645371
MICROLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristina M. Grasso
Kristina M. Grasso Kristina M. Grasso, Esq. PLLCP.O. Box 162Milford, NH 03055UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | Yarns and threads for textile use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |