USPTO serial 77645577
JUICYBUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUICYBUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing on-line auction services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |