USPTO serial 77648455
EOS CERVICAL SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EOS CERVICAL SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Pelvimeters, Intramedullary nails, Bone cementation tools and equipment, Devices for measuring intracranial pressure, Disinfection apparatus, for hospital use, Capillary drainage tubes, Capillary reagent tubes, Crutches, Physiotherapy apparatus, Radiotherapy apparatus, Radioisotope therapy apparatus and instruments, Prosthetic instruments for dental purposes, Walking aids for medical purposes, Abdominal belts, Abdominal corsets, Abdominal pads, Bone scrapers, Suture apparatus, Suture needles, Urological apparatus and instruments, Substitutes for bones/ cartilage/ ligaments and tendons, Bone retractors, Bone setting machines and instruments, Bone forceps, Osseous implants, Artificial bone parts to be implanted in natural bones, Stents, Arch supports for boots and shoes, Electrocardiographs, Amalgam carriers, Instrument cases for use by surgeons and doctors, Surgical implants, artificial materials, Scissors for surgery, Mirrors for surgeons, Surgical retractors, Surgical apparatus and instruments, Blunt curettes, for surgical use, Scalpels, Lasers for surgical and medical use, Drilling jigs forsurgical and dental applications, Platinum cauteries for surgical use, Surgical splints, Bone substitutes for surgical use, Bougies surgery, Compressors surgical, Artificial skin for surgical purposes, Electric scalpels for surgical purpose, Surgical amputaters, Knives for surgical purposes, Cutlery surgical, Surgical clips, Saws for surgical purposes, Surgical pliers, Dressing forceps for surgical use, Cannulae for anaesthetics with receptacles, Gastroscopes, Thermal packs for first aid purposes, Medical machines and apparatus, Cases fitted for medical instruments, Medical apparatus and instruments, Guidewires (Medical -), Traction apparatus for medical purposes, Prosthetic sockets used to fasten prosthetic limbs to the body, Artificial limbs, Artificial eyes, Artificial teeth and protective cupsm, Artificial teeth and caps, Artificial teeth, Artificial teeth (Sets of -), Pins for artificial teeth, Artificial bones for implantation, Subcutaneous valves for implantation, Artificial joints, Artificial pneumothorax, Endoprostheses, Intraocular lens biometers, Dialyzers, Artificial respiration (Apparatus for -), Artificial breasts, Hair prostheses, Artificial cartilage, Artificial ligament, Artificial jaws, Orthopaedic soles, Belts (Orthopaedic orthopedic -), Foortwear (Orthopaedic orthopedic -), Catheters, Cannulae, Percussion hammers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |