USPTO serial 77651521
Serial No. 77651521
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2015
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 77651521?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Vancouver, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie Verret
VALERIE VERRET BAKER BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVE STE 600DALLAS, TX 75201-2900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Mining extraction; providing information in the field of mining extraction over a global computer network; technical consulting in the field of mining | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Recycling of metallic components of electronic goods and battery components; metal refining services; providing information in the field of metal recycling over a global computer network; generation of electricity | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and development in the fields of mining and metal refining and product uses; technical consulting and engineering in the fields of mining, exploration, geology, petrology, mineralogy, metallurgy, related processes, and all associated engineering disciplines thereof; providing information in the fields of mining exploration, geology, and metallurgy over a global computer network; mining exploration services; designing processes for extraction of metals from ores and concentrates; designing recycling processes of metallic components of electronic goods and battery components; minerals exploration services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Teck Cominco Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |