Drawing for BBQ BUTLER

USPTO serial 77652195

BBQ BUTLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BBQ BUTLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael N. Mercanti

MICHAEL N. MERCANTI LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP475 PARK AVE S FL 15NEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Barbecue and grilling equipment and accessories, namely, furniture cabinets and tables and plastic storage containers for commercial or industrial useACTIVE—
021Barbecue and grilling equipment and accessories, namely, all purpose portable household containers, portable coolers; utensils for barbecue, namely, forks, tongs, turners, dishes, plates and serving spoonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 31, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 22, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 11, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 11, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 1, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 22, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance