Drawing for PEARLITE

USPTO serial 77652207

PEARLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PEARLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. May

David L. May Nixon Peabody, LLP401 9th Street, N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dental veneersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 22, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 10, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 22, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance